Enquanto que os juros da divida portuguesa atingiam máximos históricos e começava mais uma cimeira em Bruxelas, é preocupante que no live blog do FT sobre a crise da eurozona, Portugal seja várias vezes citado pela negativa, e inclusivé sejam extensamente transcritas partes da análise da Capital Economics (bolds da transcrição original pelo FT):
- Although
the government in Portugal is not as indebted as it is in Greece, we
think it is also likely to default before too long. Portugal’s existing
bail-out package should ensure that is fully funded until the end of
2012. But with the 10-year government bond yield now above 16 per cent,
it may have to seek a second rescue deal well before
that deadline expires. With little chance of the debt burden being eased
by strong growth – we expect GDP to contract sharply this year and next
as fiscal austerity bites – a debt restructuring may be a quid pro quo
for further official sector support.
- Alternatively, EU policymakers may decide that Portugal needs more
aid, but that it does not need a debt restructuring. In this case,
though, Portugal may still decide to default of its own accord if the
conditions attached to a second bail-out are too onerous.
- What’s more, we also think uncompetitive Portugal (with a large current account deficit) may choose to leave EMU
[European monetary union, otherwise known as the euro] at some point in
2013. Indeed, this outcome now forms part of our central scenario, in
which we expect Greece to be first to leave EMU this year.
No
WSJ o tom é semelhante:
- Portugal where solvency, rather than merely liquidity, is seen by many to be at issue.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário